|
Contents | Previous | Next
Summary of Key Findings
This section summarizes z/VM 5.2.0 performance with
links that take you to more detailed information.
z/VM 5.2.0 includes a number of
performance-related changes --
performance improvements,
performance considerations, and
changes that affect VM performance management.
The Enhanced Large Real Storage
Exploitation support affects all three of these in significant
ways. CP was changed so that even though most of its code continues to
run with 31-bit addressing, it is now able to work with guest pages
without first having to move them to frames that are
below the 2 GB real storage
line. Furthermore, the CP code and most of its data structures can now
reside in real storage above the 2G line. As a result, workloads that
show a 2G-line constraint on prior releases should no longer have this
constraint on z/VM 5.2.0. Furthermore, measurement
results demonstrate that z/VM can now fully utilize real storage
sizes up to the supported maximum of 128 GB.
The extensive CP changes required for this storage constraint
relief necessitated some unavoidable increases in CPU usage. Our
regression results reflect this. The
workloads experienced increases in total CPU time per transaction
ranging from 2% to 11% with the 3G high-paging workload at the top
of this range. Specialized workloads that target a narrow range of CP
services can show differences outside this range, including a net
performance improvement when the CP services being used have benefitted
from one or more of the z/VM 5.2.0 performance
improvements.
z/VM 5.2.0 includes support for QDIO Enhanced Buffer State
Management (QEBSM), a hardware assist that moves the processing
associated with typical QDIO data transfers from CP to the processor
millicode. Measurement results show
reductions in total CPU usage ranging from 13% to 36%, resulting in
throughput improvements ranging from 0% to 50% for the measured QDIO,
HiperSockets, and FCP workloads.
With APAR VM63855, z/VM 5.2.0 now supports the use of Parallel
Access Volumes (PAV) for user minidisks.
Measurement results show that the use of
PAV can greatly improve the performance of DASD volumes that
experience frequent I/O requests from multiple users.
The performance report updates for z/VM 5.2.0
also include four performance evaluations that can be
helpful when making system configuration decisions.
Linux Disk I/O Alternatives shows relative
performance for a wide range of methods that a Linux guest can choose
to do disk I/O.
Dedicated OSA vs Virtual Switch Comparison,
compares two methods of providing network connectivity to Linux guests.
Layer3 and Layer2 Comparisons,
compares the
Layer3 and Layer2 OSA-Express2 transport modes for the following cases:
1) z/VM virtual switch, 2) Linux directly attached to an OSA-Express2
Gigabit Ethernet card (1 Gb and 10 Gb).
Finally,
Guest Cryptographic Enhancements,
discusses the performance of the additional cryptographic support
provided in z/VM 5.2.0, including support for the Cryptographic
Express 2 coprocessor (CEX2C) and the Cryptographic Express2 Accelerator
coprocessor (CEX2A).
Contents | Previous | Next
|