Reusable Server Kernel
Problem 37 (Major): Worker API difficulties
=============== 2000-06-20 13:23:44 (-04.00) =============== Name: ** Suppressed ** Company: ** Suppressed ** Telephone: ** Suppressed ** E-mail: ** Suppressed ** Text: Today's /rsk/rskfix.vmarc fixes this. Enjoy! =============== 2000-06-19 16:38:38 (-04.00) =============== Name: ** Suppressed ** Company: ** Suppressed ** Telephone: ** Suppressed ** E-mail: ** Suppressed ** Text: All travel for work, actually... BKW =============== 2000-06-19 16:08:13 (-04.00) =============== Name: ** Suppressed ** Company: ** Suppressed ** Telephone: ** Suppressed ** E-mail: ** Suppressed ** Text: Sounds like a vacation to me...I'll try to hurry up then and get you the test case ASAP. Thanks. =============== 2000-06-19 13:49:55 (-04.00) =============== Name: ** Suppressed ** Company: ** Suppressed ** Telephone: ** Suppressed ** E-mail: ** Suppressed ** Text: Hi Dave, I am out of town Thursday 6/22 until Wednesday 7/5, so hurry up or wait, your choice. Brian =============== 2000-06-19 13:48:03 (-04.00) =============== Name: ** Suppressed ** Company: ** Suppressed ** Telephone: ** Suppressed ** E-mail: ** Suppressed ** Text: Hi Dave, I do not have any examples of using the worker API. I am willing to look at your problem. Load your module as a nucleus extension and find module BKWCHE therein. Set a TRACE I RUN at the BKWCHE entry point (it will be doubleword aligned, five bytes backward from the BKWCHE eyecatcher) for length X'4B0'. Spool the console and run your failing case. Send me the console at bkw@us.ibm.com. Thanks, Brian =============== 2000-06-19 12:45:04 (-04.00) =============== Name: ** Suppressed ** Company: ** Suppressed ** Telephone: ** Suppressed ** E-mail: ** Suppressed ** Text: I'm attempting to use the worker APIs provided by the RSK to shuttle some computations off to a worker machine. I can allocate the worker OK, and send it the data it needs to examine, but every now and then I get an abnormal close from the call to QueueReceiveBlock that I issue to wait for the worker to respond back with it's answer. I've looked at the message type field in the message that is returned by QueueReceiveBlock and it has an '01'x in the first byte so the abnormal close is coming from the worker side. The worker code is not RSK-based, just a simple Rexx app that uses a home grown IUCV csl to accept conenctions, get the data, do the work send the answer and do a sever.. Any working examples of using the worker services, both from the RSK point of view and the worker side? TIA
[ Help | Summary | Previous | Next ]